Posts Tagged ‘Photoshop’

Sexy Plants

by Alex Mekelburg

(close)


See other posts by Alex Mekelburg
Thursday, April 17th, 2008

Recently I’ve been looking to get some plants (trees) for my apartment. At one point after googling for “italian cypress” I came across this link:

http://www.tytyga.com/VINE-BUSH-SHRUB

which soon lead me to this page:

http://www.tytyga.com/product/Italian+Cypress+Shrubs+and+Trees

Cool – the Italian Cypress trees I was looking for. Though I’d never before thought plants were so…. cool.

After looking around the site a bit, I discovered that that guy in the red shirt is a big fan of plants:
http://www.tytyga.com/category/Crape+Myrtle+Trees-Bushes-Shrubs-Plants
http://www.tytyga.com/flowering_trees

I also quickly discovered that these pictures were clearly photoshopped (and not always that well). And the “subliminal” messaging wasn’t so “subliminal.”
http://www.tytyga.com/pine_trees

I can get the idea that “sex sells” but, I’m not sure why this guys got a gun. (4th pic on the right – Is that attractive?)
http://www.tytyga.com/product/Wax+Myrtle

And…speaking of guns…
http://www.tytyga.com/category/Wildlife+Shrub+Plants

Can I plant some cheesecake?
http://www.tytyga.com/product/Tifblue+Blueberry+Bush

I suppose I could say something interesting about how this reflects on society or the current state of affairs for the “average” website, or something general about marketing…but no, I’m just amused. And for some reason really want to buy a Palm Tree.

Photoshop like it’s 1911

by Eliot White

(close)


See other posts by Eliot White
Monday, March 24th, 2008

At the end of a recent trip to Austria, my family made a stop in Heidelberg, Germany for a night. We stayed at the Hotel Rose, which caters to the American military both in terms of its accommodations and its decor. One of the most fascinating decorations was this picture from 1911, featuring the river Neckar, the “Old Bridge,” and several important military types:

What I realized quickly after noticing it was the people clearly weren’t sitting on the bank of the river. In fact, it looks like this picture is actually composed of about 24 separate photographs taken in a studio, which led me to wonder just how the photographs were integrated into the obviously painted landscape. My guess: the photos were glued to a canvas, the canvas was photographed, then an artist painted the landscape on top of the composite photograph.

My theory of how this picture was created reminds me a lot of matte painting, a technique used in movies to create grandiose settings without having to physically build them. When was matte painting first used? 1911. So perhaps this picture used lessons learned from the early days of that technique.

Could we do something more convincing in Photoshop? Of course, but the stylization and attention to detail in this picture lends it a certain beauty that I don’t believe would be eclipsed by the realism of a Photoshop composite.