<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bit Group Blog &#187; Alex Mekelburg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bitgroup.com/author/alex_mekelburg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bitgroup.com</link>
	<description>Choose to Read.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:27:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Names are crazy</title>
		<link>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2009/04/17/names-are-crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2009/04/17/names-are-crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Mekelburg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internationalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[localization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bitgroup.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While doing a little research on internationalization of forms, I came across this post:

<a href="http://rishida.net/blog/?p=100">http://rishida.net/blog/?p=100</a>

It's a good overview of how varried naming conventions are across the world, and also links to a number of detailed wikipedia articles about particular cultures and their names.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2009/04/17/names-are-crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local vs Remote: Everything in its right place</title>
		<link>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/07/24/local-vs-remote-everything-in-its-right-place/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/07/24/local-vs-remote-everything-in-its-right-place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Mekelburg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portable Device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remoting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v12n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bitgroup.com/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an optimal world of ubiquitous broadband, how much computing power do we really need to be carrying around with us?  Which features should stay localized, and which left on the remote, centralized, powerful computing systems?  This follow-up post proposes some details on what these systems may look like... or perhaps just some ideas for a toy I want.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/07/24/local-vs-remote-everything-in-its-right-place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local vs Remote: Diverging Trends in Computing</title>
		<link>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/06/11/local-vs-remote-diverging-trends-in-computing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/06/11/local-vs-remote-diverging-trends-in-computing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Mekelburg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portable Device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remoting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[v12n]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bitgroup.com/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Portable devices are getting better and more powerful.  Virtualization technologies and cloud computing are becoming better and more mainstream.  Are these trends at odds, and, if so, will one win out over the other?  Lets take a closer look at what these mean and how the essential bond between remote access and virtualization lay the groundwork for some interesting possibilities.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/06/11/local-vs-remote-diverging-trends-in-computing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sexy Plants</title>
		<link>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/04/17/sexy-plants/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/04/17/sexy-plants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Mekelburg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bitgroup.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I've been looking to get some plants (trees) for my apartment.  At one point after googling for "italian cypress" I came across this link:

<a href="http://www.tytyga.com/VINE-BUSH-SHRUB" target="_blank">http://www.tytyga.com/VINE-BUSH-SHRUB</a>

which soon lead me to this page:

<a href="http://www.tytyga.com/product/Italian+Cypress+Shrubs+and+Trees" target="_blank">http://www.tytyga.com/product/Italian+Cypress+Shrubs+and+Trees</a>

Cool - the Italian Cypress trees I was looking for.  Though I'd never before thought plants were so.... cool.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/04/17/sexy-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ordered Dictionaries, Keyed Lists and .NET : A review</title>
		<link>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/04/04/ordered-dictionaries-keyed-lists-and-net-a-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/04/04/ordered-dictionaries-keyed-lists-and-net-a-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Mekelburg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/04/04/ordered-dictionaries-keyed-lists-and-net-a-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as .NET generic collections go, you've pretty much got two basic types. There's List<T>, which gives you an array-style type-safe collection of objects. And then there's Dictionary<tkey, tval> (and a number of other related types), which you can use for hash-style type-safe collections. But what if you want a collection of objects that you access by key and index? Or, more subtly, there's the MSDN warning "The order in which the items are returned is undefined" for all .NET Generic hash-type collections ...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.bitgroup.com/2008/04/04/ordered-dictionaries-keyed-lists-and-net-a-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
